![]() ![]() but since then, i have met so many people who have been really ho-hum about it. i remember being riveted at my temp job, sitting in front of the usually silent phone, occasionally being roused from the text to crisply say "stewart, tabori and chang" into the mouthpiece. and i was nineteen or thereabouts when i read secret history. and i feel like i have written this review before, for all the books chasing donna tartt's tail. brilliant underachievers? crumbling mansion? wealthy layabouts sponsoring a poor friend? mysterious happenings? moral blurriness? alcohol and drug anesthesia? but a lot of it is just a secret history tongue and groove DIY project. ![]() It gets points for having the central character named karen. 1)there is no option for three-and-a-halfĢ)it was kind of the perfect book to suit my mood in the day-and-a-half it took me to read itģ)in the spectrum of "books that claim to be just like secret history" this one takes home high marks.īut really - it's just a fast-paced crime thriller and is not likely to stay with me for any real amount of time. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
May 2023
Categories |